Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:33

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

"I Always Travel With This": Doctors Are Sharing The Illness-Avoiding Practices They Always Implement While Traveling, And They're So Important - BuzzFeed

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

Do you think the constitution and laws should be taught in school?

Actually have some literary skill:

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Many if not most, are in this category.

If "thinking" affects feeling, and "feeling" affects thinking, then "why" does this not produce a never-ending circle?

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

S&P 500 to Soar on Fading Tariffs Impact, Analysts Say - Barron's

Because reading is WORK. Period.

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

I’m wondering about attachment and transference with the therapist and the idea of escape and fantasy? How much do you think your strong feelings, constant thoughts, desires to be with your therapist are a way to escape from your present life? I wonder if the transference serves another purpose than to show us our wounds and/or past experiences, but is a present coping strategy for managing what we don’t want to face (even if unconsciously) in the present—-current relationships, life circumstances, etc. Can anyone relate to this concept of escape in relation to their therapy relationship? How does this play out for you?

Entertainment.

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

What happened to your school bully?

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Netflix and chill is a thing:

What was the weakest period in US history in terms of military strength? Was it during World War II or the Vietnam War?

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

Here's What Happens to Your Blood Pressure When You Eat Blueberries Every Day - AOL.com

PC: Google

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

PC: Google

Big Match & Segment Announced for June 6 WWE SmackDown - Ringside News

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

If Russia needs the resources to fund the war in Ukraine, why doesn’t it throw open its doors to visa free western tourism? Enough people would be interested, & it would start to get some hard currency as €, CHF, £, SEK, $, JPY in the tills at shops.

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

What's wrong with generation Z?

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Trump is shot, tackled by SS agents, yet then stands, defiant, with fist high, and 52 hours later, walks into the Republican Convention to thunderous applause. Is there anything that can stop this man, who loves his country? Does he get your vote?

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

PC: Google

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

PC: The Guardian

Have the ability to visualize:

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

There are some books that just…suck!

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

PC: Google…my precious!

PC: Google